Georgia Pie lab report

Yes: Georgia Pie usually clears the 20% total-THC line, with 81% of 499 flower tests at that cutoff or higher; the shares were 24% at 25% and 2.4% at 30%.¹

Across states, Maryland was the high end and Nevada the low end: the 20% share was 92% across 117 Maryland tests with a 23.36% median, versus 74% across 85 Nevada tests with a 21.59% median.¹ Different growers, labs and testing rules by state are part of that spread.

The 20–26% range from Weedmaps covers the largest share of Georgia Pie lab tests among the published ranges we checked, at 63%; for single THC figures, only 1 of 2 sat above the 22.60% median.^1,3 SeedFinder's 26% single figure was the ceiling we found, and 18%, about 1 in 5, reached that cutoff.^1,4

The lower single figure was 20% from Leafly; 81%, about 8 in 10, landed on that benchmark or higher.^1,5 Range checks were wider apart: the 20–26% interval from Weedmaps covered 63%, while AllBud's 25–27% interval covered 13%.^1,3,6

These outside figures are only benchmarks; they do not describe a particular jar, while the batch COA is the jar-level record.

The terpene lead in Georgia Pie tests is β-caryophyllene: it held the top spot in 63% of Georgia Pie's 91 terpene reports, while limonene led 36% and α-humulene led 1.1%.¹ That lead is clear but not dominant enough to call the profile settled.¹

The lab data back both outside terpene labels: β-caryophyllene took the lead in 63% of reports, the same terpene named by Leafly and SeedFinder.^1,4,5

Nevada dominates the terpene sample, contributing 85 reports out of 91; read the lead shares mainly as that market's flower, not a balanced national sample.¹

The closest terpene profiles to Georgia Pie are Candyland at 93%, Gushers at 91% and Tropicana Cherry at 91%; Durban Poison is the least similar comparison in the 36-strain set, at 34%.¹

The nearest profiles listed here are led by β-caryophyllene, while Durban Poison's lead is terpinolene.¹

Method note: we convert each strain's median results for eight terpenes into parts of the combined total, then compare the overlap; identical mixes score 100. A strain enters only with at least 30 individual-terpene reports.¹ This is a chemistry-only match, not a prediction of how Georgia Pie will feel.

Among qualifying strains, Georgia Pie is above average in this lab set, ranking 14th of 52 by median total THC at 22.60%, in the top third and squeezed between White Fire OG at 22.61% and Purple Haze at 22.39%.¹ At the 25% cutoff, 24% of tests met or beat it, placing Georgia Pie 19th.¹

The central half is tight for this pool: 20.60%–24.92%, a span of 4.32 points, ranks 10th narrowest among 52 strains with enough data.¹ That puts Georgia Pie's results on the steadier side.

With batch composition varying by grower and state, Georgia Pie labs differ within Michigan, where qualifying in-state lab medians spanned 4.25 points; across all 7 labs meeting the 20-test cutoff, medians ran from 20.48% at Lab F in Nevada to 25.95% at Lab C in Michigan, a gap of 5.47 points.¹

Inside Michigan, lab choice still mattered: 4 labs met the cutoff, and their medians covered 4.25 points, with endpoints of 21.70% and 25.95%.¹

Labs test different growers' flower, so this spread alone is not evidence that any one lab reads high. We mask lab identities here; the largest-volume lab is Lab A, and the download gives the real names.

Yes: in 207 paired Georgia Pie reports, the top THC third began at 23.97% and carried a median 2.53% total terpenes, versus 1.73% in the bottom third, which ended at 21.58%; the terpene gap was 0.80 points.¹

Using the 30-paired-report minimum, the direction repeated in every qualifying state subset: Maryland up and Nevada up, so 2 of 2 states matched the overall pattern.¹ Total terpene percentage weighs aroma compounds in the sample; it is not evidence about effects.

No, not in Maryland: Georgia Pie's state-only median moved from 23.29% in 2020 to 22.79% in 2023, a flat −0.50 points.¹ Across the full eligible-year dataset, medians rose from 20.62% in 2020 (44 tests) to 22.95% in 2023 (64), a change of +2.33 points.¹

Because the state mix changes by year, the all-state trend can diverge from a state-specific view. We omit years unless they have 20 or more tests.¹

Yes: exact-name Georgia Pie records in the lab feed were mostly flower, at 88% of 646; the non-flower remainder was led by shake and trim (6.2%), then concentrates (5.0%) and pre-rolls (1.4%).¹ This site's strain figures use flower only.

The name also appeared inside 95 longer labels, or 13% of all results that contained Georgia Pie; the leading examples were “Z x Georgia Pie” (5), “BENMORE FF GEORGIA PIE (2024) - L/R” (5) and “Georgia Pie x Project 4516 Flower” (5).¹ Longer labels can mark crosses, extra descriptors or other products, so we exclude them under the name-matching method.

Mixed, leaning pricier: Georgia Pie was lower than the typical strain in 1 of 6 exact-eighth markets we could compare; in the Oct 4, 2026 Weedmaps pull, 191 store listings for its flower sat within 50 miles of market centers, with coverage in 19 of 27 markets and a 26th place among 58 tracked strains.²

By exact eighth, Georgia Pie matched the comparison median in Los Angeles ($25.00 against $25.00), priced above it in Oklahoma City ($19.85 against $17.04), Detroit ($20.00 against $16.00), Newark ($45.00 against $42.88) and Las Vegas ($26.25 against $25.00), and priced below it in Seattle ($24.00 against $30.00).² That left 1 lower-priced market out of 6 comparisons, a mixed outcome.²